![]() However, in this case the Rogue has a new variable-compression engine. Those expectations are not always grounded in data, as past Rogues have been largely as reliable as the CR-V. The 20 hp difference in the power output between these two engines is a lot less important than customer expectations of reliability and longevity. ![]() ![]() That’s enough to give it an edge in resale, and perhaps place it on the pedestal in the buyer’s mind. Why?īecause, while the Nissan is the better drive and offers slicker technology, the CR-V says Honda on the front. But more than a few buyers will walk back to Honda. A test drive will almost certainly just underline the advantage. Article contentĪnyone comparing interiors in an automall-type setting will walk from the Honda dealer to the Nissan dealer and be impressed. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Here’s how they stack up against each other. Currently, the Toyota RAV4 is king of the midsize crossover segment, but the Rogue and the CR-V are locked in a battle over second place. However, to those actually spending their money on the largest consumer purchase short of a house, the differences loom large. To aliens from the planet Omicron Persei 8, this Nissan and this Honda are basically the exact same vehicle. A dash of ground clearance, an efficient engine, and the all-wheel-drive that Canadian customers usually demand.Ĭompare the specs of these midsize crossovers: Nissan Rogue vs Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4 Styling that features a big badge, but errs on the side of bland familiarity rather than boldness. Thanks to convergent evolution - the natural selection that makes a dolphin look like a shark - cars in this segment are all pretty similar. Midsize crossovers are the products that make or break a mainstream brand these days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |